https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Join Slack
Powered by
Related. Would you like to be able to run multiple...
# development
h
Related. Would you like to be able to run multiple python_binary targets in a single run? They would run sequentially
cc @polite-garden-50641
And then I think we may want to add a 
./pants run --fail-early
flag
p
maybe... but again, this is more typing... we can infer that from flags being passed thru to pytest.
h
run
goal, not 
test
goal
p
I don't have an opinion here. I am not using 
./pants run
since it is too slow for me (https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/10513)
I just can't wait for it to build the reqs file when I want to run things and seeding stuff by using 
binary
doesn't work.
h
Got it. See https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/10513#issuecomment-674556335 about how we’ve aligned it with 
test
and 
repl
to avoid having to re-resolve as frequently. Benjy is also going to switch on the 
--python-setup-resolve-all-constraints
option in Toolchain, which will dramatically reduce the amount of resolves in general
@happy-kitchen-89482 any opinions on the top of the thread, if we should loosen the constraints on 
run
?
h
We can, it's super non-urgent so let's not worry about it for now.
h
It’s only a 5 line change that takes 5 minutes to put together
h
Hmm, yeah I guess it makes sense
w
watch out, because order would matter there
easiest not to, and loosen the constrain later if you see a usecase.
h
True. I ended up not doing it. The code change is easy; the semantics are not.
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by