you gave the feedback that you d like

Question

< polite garden 50641> you gave the feedback that you d like to be able to continue using `test debug` on a `python tests` target rather than having to run one specific file Makes sense More generally would you want to be able to run ` pants test debug ` i e to run in debug mode for gt 1 target We might be able to remove that restriction

polite-garden-50641 · Answer

Yes I think it makes sense to remove that restriction and if it means that pants now will run stuff sequentially instead of in parallel when this flag is present that makes sense too

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

Cool Yes exactly it would run sequentially rather than in parallel because you can only have one process in the foreground at a time

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

If a single target fails would you expect Pants to continue running the others or to fail early Personally I think I d expect it to continue as the user can press ctrl c or ctrl d to early exit

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

Yay this was really easy to implement slightly smiling face

polite-garden-50641 · Answer

it should continue unless the ` x` flag or equivalent was passed thru to pytest

polite-garden-50641 · Answer

having said that I don t think this is a 2 0 thing and can wait for 2 1

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

It was way easier to do than I expected <https github com pantsbuild pants pull 10629> No need to wait for 2 1 slightly smiling face