but rather than just sending you a link, one of us should probably actually revert the removal and get it compiling again and then send you a link to that

i’ll follow up next week to either do that, or ask Eric to. but in the meantime, “just invoking the JVM like you normally would” is the path forward… after the revert, there will be an additional toggle on

Process

that you can use.

re:

sjavac

: seems similar to zinc. i’d love to see whether coarsened file-level compilation makes wrappers unnecessary.