<@U051221NF>: thanks for getting the M1 workflow i...
# development
@happy-kitchen-89482: thanks for getting the M1 workflow in place: sorry i missed review.
is there a reason that it is a separate workflow, rather than a job in the existing workflow?
it looks like that means it can’t depend on the
job the way https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/14935 did for other bootstrap jobs
Not a strong reason. It started out that way when I wasn't sure if we'd want to trigger it on a different set of builds than the existing workflow, due to resource contention on the single M1 machine, and to avoid confusion
But it probably doesn't need to be