<@U02KAN6061E> Did your pex_binary running changes...
# development
h
@bitter-ability-32190 Did your pex_binary running changes alter the CWD of the sandboxed run? It should be the repo root, but I'm not sure it is now?
b
How are you measuring this? The default after my changes is the same pre-my changes. I'm not sure it messes with CWD at all. The sandbox is in the sys path via the
[pythom].default_run_goal_use_sandbox
option, or via the
run_goal_use_sandbox
field on that target
w
hm: yea, the behavior change is more subtle than the
cwd
it looks like. we’ll have to work up a repro.
👀 1
b
FWIW the code should've been a 1:1 copy of the code pre-my change. I just lifted it to a helper 🙈
should
w
will bisect within the range. but seems just as likely to have been PEX changes.
b
Looks like John chimed in with the same thought I had w.r.t. what changed
w
i’ll probably resume looking at it tomorrow, but without yet having actually looked at any of the links that John posted, my first reaction is: “this case shouldn’t need
--no-strip-pex-env
, since there shouldn’t be any pex path shenangians for this case”
w
yea