The 2.13 docs say “Java and Scala support is beta ...
# development
h
The 2.13 docs say “Java and Scala support is beta stage”. Should they still be saying that?
I feel like we’re shortchanging ourselves
w
this gets to the discussion of how the lifecycle of “experimental” features is tracked. i haven’t caught up on the other thread re: naming, but i think that a really important aspect of improving experimental features is going to be ensuring that they’re always tagged with a tracking issue that explains their status.
👍 1
👍🏻 1
right now, a tracking issue for JVM would reference at least some of the issues from https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22backend%3A+JVM%22
f
Tracking is essential regardless of name
👍 2
It takes the guesswork out of questions like "how beta is beta?"
h
I guess the backend is still named
experimental
So that docs warning is reasonable