<@U021C96KUGJ> I’m back to playing around with `ex...
# development
s
@ancient-vegetable-10556 I’m back to playing around with
experimental_shell_command
+
yarn
, and hit another case of bad perf 🧵
a
hooray
s
in this case I ran
export-codegen
on the target so I could poke at the files
a
aha
s
wondering if one of your perf fixes internally could be applied elsewhere
a
Have you tried the new
execution_dependencies
field?
s
I have not 🤔 is that in 2.15.x? or only on
main
?
a
That’s on
main
at the moment (and may justify a backport, imho). The hope is that it separates out the data that’s needed to run your
esc
from the data that your
esc
generates… it may help if you’re not trying to copy out the entire
node_modules
s
I (unfortunately) think this will need to copy out the whole dir 🫠
a
oh dear.
s
indeed
I have many “wtf”s for our team that handles the tooling for front-end development
a
I’ll check in to see if I can look at that build log momentarily
s
👍 I deleted one of my messages in the thread above about where time was spent because I re-read the logs and think my original impression was wrong
a
I assume you don’t get minutes copying
node_modules
between multiple `esc`s, right?
s
that is next on my list to check 🙂 just finished wiring the
yarn install
and wanted to sanity-check it
a
Your early demonstration case took 15-30 seconds on my M1 macbook, so it may still take a while on a less capable machine
s
in positive news, pants seems to be more efficient at writing the files to
dist/codegen
than
rm
is at deleting them from there 😂
🤪 1