Oh womp womp <https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1...
# random
b
Oh womp womp https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/11648 So no chance in running a
--venv
pex using
pyoxy
(or anything relying on
pip
)
e
The lack of support for
__file__
is a non-starter. I am floored by all the great work indygreg has kicked out, but this ticket is denying reality: https://github.com/indygreg/PyOxidizer/issues/69 I expect you might get a similar opinion to mine from the Pip folks.
h
skinner-out-of-touch.gif
b
If nothing else, it can be a forcing function to just have the "standard" remove the optional-ibility of
__file__
But also, IMO something owned by the PSF should probably adhere to their own restrictions πŸ™‚
e
The PyPA is pretty much not the PSF in another accepting reality binge. They even have their own PEP sub-genre semi-officially that they acknowledge.
b
Fair
e
Basically, they have the crappiest job in the PSF, they have to deal with the arguably biggest missing feature of Python, packaging and consumption.
b
"their own PEP sub-genre" is a fascinating phrase
e
Its for real!
b
Oh I'm sure. It just really stirs the imagination!
e
I can dig up the threads later
Its mayhem. I have no love for the products of the PyPA in general but I empathize with the position they are in.
πŸ‘ 1
b
I'm picturing what's the equivalent of YA Dragon Stories as a sub-genre?
e
You might be of the age to have been exposed to Choose Your Own Adventure books? I think that's the sub-genre, but with all choices except the exact right ones getting you anything but death.
b
I freaking loved those books. I read every ending. Followed all the paths. They always had several dud endings that made me question the whole concept. But I still needed to know the entire universe of possibilities.
e
Well, you must love Python packaging then!
b
I'm here, aren't I?
Mwahahahaha
πŸ˜‚ 1
e
I feel like I have just about reached proficiency in the ecosystem, certainly not mastery! and that took ~4 years of Pex maintainership.
I pity the fool.
b
Honestly, though, I prefer canonical endings. Give me a good Encyclopedia Brown or Nancy Drew any day.
e
Ok, you are of the age then for sure!
b
imo an author should be opinionated about the right way for a plot to wrap up, and commit. This is a design theory editorial.
e
Ok, I think its time for https://perk.uno/go/getback.wav
I had fun though.
b
Hahah the brilliant thing about my job is this is part of it. 😝
h
There was a whole New Yorker article about one of the two guys who invented Choose Your Own Adventure, written in CYOA style!
e
I ... I ... it gave me a sense of agency? My god.
b
β€œIt’s hard enough to get children to read, and you’re just making it harder, with all these choices.” 😱
"rewarding what you always considered to be cheating: flipping through the pages to find the endings you wanted, then reverse-engineering the choices that would get you there" -- so that wasn't just me doing that, huh? Dang.
πŸ˜‚ 1
h
I liked them a little bit, but I greatly preferred just reading regular books
"If you want to resurrect the Jesus-allegory lion, go to page 85. If you want to plunge Narnia into never-ending darkness go to page 92". It doesn't really work.
πŸ˜‚ 1
e
If you want to pip install pytorch for nvidia cuda, burn this book now.
πŸ˜‚ 4