I'm on MOTW this week. My release plan is: - 2.16....
# development
b
I'm on MOTW this week. My release plan is: • 2.16.x: we've had 2.16.1rc4 around for a while, so seems like I can cut 2.16.1 (https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/20218 ) and close the milestone... alternatively, just close the milestone without doing a final release. We're already up to 2.18.0, and releases before 2.18 are a significant investment of time... • 2.17.x: we did 2.17.1 and 2.18.0, so... nothing; close the milestone? • 2.18.x: 2.18.1rc0 soon (https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/20216, ) and then maybe a 2.18.1 by the end of the week with a few mostly-JVM fixes? • 2.19.x: 2.19.0rc0 as normal • main (2.20.x): 2.20.0.dev0 as normal : https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/20215 Let me know if you have thoughts.
c
I think it would be nice to not end the 2.16.x with a “dangling” rc.. but could of course close the milestone before the final release to indicate that we don’t intend to add more to it besides eventually getting the release out. My $0.02 🙂
👍 1
agree it is the lowest prio release..
👍 1
b
Done 2.16.1, and several of the others. I'll close the 2.16.x and 2.17.x milestones later in the week (and push the open issues in 2.18.x or just no-milestone) if I don't hear objections in the next day or two.
I've closed the 2.16.x and 2.17.x milestones. Thanks for everyone's efforts for the bugfixes after the .0 releases to get the .1s out!
❤️ 5
b
This means we can officially switch scie-pants to PEX-only releases for all versions. I think it also means we can start locking old branches