is it accepted that allowing `./pants test ::` is ...
# development
a
is it accepted that allowing
./pants test ::
is a good thing, or is there an alternative we're thinking of? because i like that and am thinking outwards from there but might be missing something
a
Depends. How do you feel about having something in a BUILD file you thought was a test, but which pants doesn't think is, which silently doesn't get run?
a
awful
i think we can start with strictness and eventually get to being able to
./pants test ::
a la https://pantsbuild.slack.com/archives/C0D7TNJHL/p1546890790066500?thread_ts=1546890603.064700&cid=C0D7TNJHL
w
responded in the other thread on that topic
a
let's use that one