<@U6ZRNH0TC> On the logging execute process reques...
# developmenta
average-vr-56795
01/14/2019, 10:33 AM@aloof-angle-91616 On the logging execute process request thing - yeah, I definitely agree that some kind of wokunit-like concept, and an option to implicitly tee failures’ stdout/stderr to the command line, could be super useful… I definitely wouldn’t want the abbreviated LHS-less yield thing… `ExecuteProcessRequest`s already have a description which we can use as the description… I think ideally we’d want something a little more concise than your example, but it’s a great start to be going from 🙂
a
aloof-angle-91616
01/15/2019, 5:45 PMconciseness sounds great! implicitly teeing the output is super reasonable
aloof-angle-91616
01/15/2019, 5:46 PM(along with the description field, which imo was basically waiting for this use case)
aloof-angle-91616
01/15/2019, 5:46 PMone thing i didn't consider was that the rule itself could be the workunit