so, while this was probably the right change (supp...
# development
a
so, while this was probably the right change (suppressing background workunits: https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/7997), i happened to find those useful for debugging cache insertion issues such as those described in https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/7860, which is recurring again. would anyone be opposed to me posting a PR which makes that suppression into a boolean option?
w
before the bug that #7997 fixed, background workunits were not rendered on the CLI either, afaik... only in
./pants server
. having said that, always rendering failed background workunits would be useful.