I at first really liked that idea. But, the `name`...
# development
h
I at first really liked that idea. But, the
name
is the canonical ID for the target. So I wonder if a little bit of explicitness is good, so that you know how to reference it, rather than having to have this insider knowledge of what the default is. It’s also a little tricky to do because
name
is an extremely special-cased kwarg. It doesn’t use the Target API. There is no
Name
Field
. The name gets preprocessed, and then the
Target
constructor just gets the resulting
Address