Ergonomic, hermetic, user-friendly software build system for Python, Go, Java, Kotlin, Protobuf, Scala, Shell. Pants lets you fearlessly scale up your codebase!

Pants

<@U021C96KUGJ>, <@U0N6C2Q9F>: random thought about generalizing `exports`, `packages`, `provides`, and visibility (at least for the purposes of inference). if we made `exports`, `packages`, all _symbol_ level with wildcards (rather than target or package level) the way the way that `provides` are, then perhaps our implementation of visibility could be symbol level as well… that would make it very, very similar to language level visibility.

no idea what the visibility syntax would look like, but could take inspiration from scala:
```private[com.example] def ...```
or rust:
```pub(crate) fn ...```
etc

we’ve got a bit of a proliferation going… not a priority to standardize in the next few weeks, but definitely before leaving experimental

makes sense. I definitely support making configuration syntax a lot more consistent