Re: <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/73...
# developmentw
wide-midnight-78598
05/10/2022, 5:59 PMRe: https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/7369
Is there any value in looking at
pyoxyđź’Ż 1
wide-midnight-78598
05/10/2022, 6:00 PMHa! I misread that the blog post came out March 10th, not this morning 🙂
w
witty-crayon-22786
05/10/2022, 6:41 PMyea, possibly relevant… @enough-analyst-54434 is likely going to be picking that issue up in the next few weeks.
witty-crayon-22786
05/10/2022, 6:41 PMi expect that we’ll continue to have a “setup”/`pants` script, and so we have flexibility as to the distribution model… one file vs two isn’t really a problem.
witty-crayon-22786
05/10/2022, 6:44 PMbut it’s not clear to me how
pyoxypyoxyw
wide-midnight-78598
05/10/2022, 6:53 PMI was primarily thinking of standalone python dists - because on my machine(s), I've definitely noted some quirks with how my py environments are or aren't picked up - also also if my python for pants is out of sync with what my project needs.
I wasn't particularly thinking about the other aspects. I still think that, ideally, a single PyOxidizer'd (or whatever) binary would be the goal.
w
witty-crayon-22786
05/10/2022, 6:54 PMgot it. yea, that wouldn’t be https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/7369 though… that would be as a way for Pants to provide its own python interpreters for user code
witty-crayon-22786
05/10/2022, 6:55 PMthere has been some discussion of adding support for an optional private
pyenvpyoxyđź‘Ť 2