Another Q:
Does Pants support <PEP 420 – Implicit ...
# generalh
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 2:56 PMAnother Q:
Does Pants support PEP 420 – Implicit Namespace Packages?
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 2:57 PM🧵
n
narrow-vegetable-37489
10/05/2022, 3:02 PMYep! Using it daily without any issues 🙂
h
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 3:02 PM🎉 🙏
b
bitter-ability-32190
10/05/2022, 3:03 PMAlso supports explicit namespace packages, which I personally recommend 😛
h
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 3:03 PMDo you mean the
__path__ = __import__("pkgutil").extend_path(__path__, __name__)b
bitter-ability-32190
10/05/2022, 3:03 PMYeah (looks about right)
bitter-ability-32190
10/05/2022, 3:04 PMIt's ugly as hell, but I prefer explicit over implicit 🙈
h
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 3:06 PMI see.
I do also, but it seems that in the NS case the implicit is the standard 😞
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 3:09 PMAlso, I get a lot of warnings of the form:
Copy code
16:51:26.87 [WARN] Pants cannot infer owners for the following imports in the target proj_1/test/foo.py:
* numpy (line: 2)clickb
bitter-ability-32190
10/05/2022, 3:10 PMMight wanna start a new 🧵
h
high-magician-46188
10/05/2022, 3:10 PMAck
6 Views