Any technical reason some of our actions are on ub...
# developmentw
wide-midnight-78598
11/03/2025, 12:55 AMAny technical reason some of our actions are on ubuntu 22.04?
h
happy-kitchen-89482
11/03/2025, 1:15 AMAs opposed to?
w
wide-midnight-78598
11/03/2025, 2:16 AM24?
wide-midnight-78598
11/03/2025, 2:16 AMubuntu-latest
ubuntu-2404
wide-midnight-78598
11/03/2025, 2:26 AMhttps://github.com/actions/runner-images/pull/13194/files
Though as I look at it, they recently reverted an update on it - so something is sketch - something about some Azure kernel thing
h
happy-kitchen-89482
11/03/2025, 3:43 AMI don't think there's a reason, if it works on latest we could go for that
w
wide-midnight-78598
11/03/2025, 3:44 AMI'll wait until they fix their NodeJS debacle
c
curved-manchester-66006
11/04/2025, 3:51 AMI could be missing some rust magic somewhere, but isn't glibc only forwards compatible? That is if we link against glibc 2.X, then all users of Pants must be on >=2.x
(Like manylinux)
w
wide-midnight-78598
11/04/2025, 4:10 AMAh right, I guess we're not statically linking musl or something are we. Hmm... This feels like the kinda thing we should be reliant on cargo cross/zigbuild for. Lot more precise, and a bit more OS independent
13 Views