Ergonomic, hermetic, user-friendly software build system for Python, Go, Java, Kotlin, Protobuf, Scala, Shell. Pants lets you fearlessly scale up your codebase!

Pants

Jumping back to the call-by-name discussion, isn't `rule_runner.request()` effectively the same as a `Get()`? With Get going away, that testing pattern becomes very obtuse. Do we have any plans/ideas for updating the rule_runner to make tests feel more like call-by-name?

Yeah, I should probably take a look at that.

I don't think I suggested `pants3`. I pointed out the analogous change in pex with `pex` and `pex3` , but I think I would like a different cli entry point than `pants3` because adding a version number feels like a "release" instead of an experimental alternative interface.

bye all, thanks! <@U09HATU3DT6> sorry I couldn't stick around for any questions you have, but the other folks can hopefully help out, and I'm on Slack as needed.

<https://github.com/NVIDIA/Dependency-Patterns/blob/main/README.md>

The "Mathutils Module" demo is a simple example of the kind of dynamic dependency resolution we're looking for a story for.