happy-kitchen-89482
03/17/2025, 3:25 AMmonorepo.build
and pants.build
, but has never done anything with either of them. I’m not inclined to renew them, as it’s $75/year to do so in the build
TLD for some reason, unless anyone has a differing opinion?happy-kitchen-89482
03/17/2025, 3:25 AMhappy-kitchen-89482
03/17/2025, 3:26 AMpants.build
, at a stretchwide-midnight-78598
03/17/2025, 2:48 PMpants.build
maybe to avoid malicious typo-squattingwide-midnight-78598
03/17/2025, 2:50 PMproud-dentist-22844
03/17/2025, 3:08 PM<https://get.pants.build>
redirect to the get-pants.sh script, or even directly serve it. Not sure if it's worth $75 though.
Dropping monorepo.build
sounds reasonable.wide-midnight-78598
03/17/2025, 4:23 PMWe could makeSure, just mean about keeping the domain vs kiboshing it. typos are always tricky, and typos for cases where we have scripts that pull from a URL - eesh. I don't do those in general, so doesn't affect me. But the majority of devs probably doredirect to the get-pants.sh script, or even directly serve it. Not sure if it's worth $75 though.<https://get.pants.build>
proud-dentist-22844
03/17/2025, 4:25 PMget-pants.sh
is when I'm adding pants to a new repo or checking for updates to the copy I keep in each repo 😛 Then I document that people should use the script in the repo they just cloned.proud-dentist-22844
03/17/2025, 4:27 PMproud-dentist-22844
03/17/2025, 4:33 PMget-pants.sh
is available for $35/year - that would have quite the "cool" factor, but it's not particularly useful. At least my employer blocks non-standard TLDs by default, so I would have to get that unblocked to use it. I can't access pants.build
or monorepo.build
for example.
(I disagree with their security methodology, but oh well)happy-kitchen-89482
03/17/2025, 8:54 PMhappy-kitchen-89482
03/17/2025, 8:54 PMpants.build
for now, but let monorepo.build
expire unless I hear other opinions