Devs, from the above and an accumulation of other observations been pondering a different way to think of the problems currently being solved by

parametrize

. But it has probably already been discussed. Is there something outside of: • Support for pairing specific resolves and interpreter constraints ... • Target “Parameterization” and “Configuration” • and Add generic support for parametrizing metadata ... that you'd recommend reading as context behind the existing

parametrize

?

Those seem right to me!

ok, then I'll write/draw something up as food for thought. Wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.