Feedback is welcome to the <Pants 2.17.0 blog post...
# development
f
Feedback is welcome to the Pants 2.17.0 blog post draft. If there are any notable features / changes I've not included, please do comment in the document.
šŸ™ 2
@curved-television-6568 What's the story with this one? Will this one make it into 2.17.0? It would be terrific if it could as we now suggest running
pants dependencies ::
to validate all the dependencies. https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/19188
b
Thanks for starting this! There were a few additional things that were missed from the initial "What's new", which could maybe be added to the post too https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/19629 (I can take a look later, but I have to do some other work for a bit)
It'd be really good to call out the new sponsorship options, since I think this is the first major release since then. I've sketched some text in the 19629, but that's definitely just a draft
c
https://pantsbuild.slack.com/archives/C0D7TNJHL/p1692528483580929?thread_ts=1692528451.518099&amp;cid=C0D7TNJHL
The story being the change surfaced an (pants internal) issue with regard to Python interpreter constraints. It’s been since fixed on the 2.18.x line but not yet backported to 2.17. (unless I missed it while being away, updating the PR now..)
f
okay, amazing, so we will'be able to do
./pants lint --only=visibility ::
in the 2.17, right?
c
only if merged, yes. cc @happy-kitchen-89482 regarding stabilizing 2.17 we need to make a call if we want to include this or not.
h
I don't mind doing another RC for this, we can turn it around quickly
It's low impact on the rest of the system
Can we get this merged into 2.17.x today?
c
I can look at it later tonight..
b
It looks like #19188 might have a ā€œrealā€ failure? Given it’s a new feature that’s an iteration on a feature from 2.16, I propose that we let it go for 2.17, and ship it/announce it in 2.18 instead. Thanks for the work on attempting to get it in. What do you think?
c
I’m ok with slipping this one to 2.18 (but I know Alexey would very much like it in 2.17) but if we keep a sane release cadence perhaps 2.18 doesn’t have to be too far out 😃
b
Yeah, I’m excited for quick releases too!
f
sure, it can wait till 2.18, not a big deal at all!
šŸ‘ 2