this could support smarter app runtimes that could...
# pexr
rough-minister-58256
11/13/2019, 9:14 PMthis could support smarter app runtimes that could do things like bootstrap their own resources/deps/interpreters/etc or other interesting features
a
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:15 PMyes, i’d really really like this to happen
r
rough-minister-58256
11/13/2019, 9:16 PMto this end: I have heard lots of complaints of late about multi-second pex execution startup times from Twitter folks, I worry it’s gotten worse recently. that’d be a core problem to fix in both pex and any carry-forward.
a
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:17 PMyes, that’s partially why i wanted to pursue the dehydrated solution within pex (i wanted a formal solution instead of throwaway scripts)
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:18 PMwe can try to pair on this sometime this week or anytime in the future if you’d like
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:21 PMi also personally need to get more familiar with the pex bootstrap process and what the profile looks like when a pex is executed
h
hundreds-father-404
11/13/2019, 9:21 PMHuh do you think any of this is that Pants no longer includes .pyc? When did the complaints start?
a
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:25 PMi assumed that it happens when you start making really large pex files and try to execute them immediately as part of an interactive application
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:26 PMa previously unknown use case to me but seems like it could exacerbate any issues
h
hundreds-father-404
11/13/2019, 9:27 PMI’m not sure if they’re added at runtime..hm. Definitely not at build time so that Pexes are reproducible for V2
a
aloof-angle-91616
11/13/2019, 9:32 PMwe should take care not to affect use cases that don’t need that reproducibility though
r
rough-minister-58256
11/13/2019, 10:30 PMprobably something that needs to be benchmarked and profiled for optimization
2 Views