witty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 6:34 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 7:09 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:11 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:12 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:16 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:16 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:17 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:19 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:20 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:20 PMhappy-kitchen-89482
12/19/2019, 9:23 PMpants.backend.python.linthundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:23 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:25 PMbackend_packages? I haven’t closely followed the different PRs you have uphappy-kitchen-89482
12/19/2019, 9:25 PMbackend_package2 for v2 rules.happy-kitchen-89482
12/19/2019, 9:25 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:29 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:29 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:32 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 9:33 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 9:34 PMhundreds-father-404
12/19/2019, 10:26 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 10:40 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 10:40 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/19/2019, 10:43 PMhundreds-father-404
12/20/2019, 2:26 AMaverage-vr-56795
12/20/2019, 10:47 AMlint and fmt, which still has work to do
2. I definitely don’t think we can say we have a stable lint/fmt experience if, like happened with https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/8823 our response to a review comment of “Can we add some tests” is “I’m busy right now, I’ll do it as a follow up some time?” - I don’t really mind that happening here, because I view the code as unstable and experimental, but if we’re trying to make claims of stability in release notes, that’s not the attitude we should be taking 🙂average-vr-56795
12/20/2019, 10:49 AMhundreds-father-404
12/20/2019, 1:14 PMwitty-crayon-22786
12/20/2019, 4:26 PM