we've found two items related to `--[no-]fast` tha...
# announce
w
we've found two items related to
--[no-]fast
that we'll probably want to try and fix as part of
1.25.x
... i'll see if i can get patches out for them today.
👍 1
h
Cool, thanks. Do you know what the issues are?
w
1) coverage isn't merged across targets, 2) "test specs" in junit fail if any of multiple targets don't match, which is likely if you run for more than one target.
h
Ah, I think I ran into both of these with the Junit tests and wasn’t clear how to fix them.. Do they sound fixable?
w
yea... just a pain in the butt
(...because already fixed in v2, heh)
👍 1
h
Worst case, Toolchain would be okay with reverting the PR. We only were doing it as a courtesy to try to make the V1 migration to V2 smoother for users, but don’t have any particular use case for it
w
i think we're in the long tail at this point. and we can set
--fast
for now in each of these locations.
💯 1