@dry-analyst-73584: I'm of the opinion that that test is brittle and unnecessary. It's making a bunch of assumptions about the output of pants that are only indirectly related to what it's testing: whether the artifact cache is used. Since checkstyle uses the vanilla, builtin caching pants provides out of the box, I don't think it needs to be testing it. We should already have tests that confirm that the artifact cache hasn't suddenly broken.