hey there I started testing pants 2 0 0a1 and I noticed that

Question

hey there I started testing pants 2 0 0a1 and I noticed that `python app` is causing chaos and there isnt `bundle` as a goal anymore disappointed Did it become something else or we won t have support for that on v2 0

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

Hey Thales Yeah for now `python app` isn t supported because we plan to redesign it in a better way <https www pantsbuild org v2 0 docs how to upgrade pants 2 0 python app and the bundle goal are removed 130 vs 20> For now the closest alternative would be running `binary` Is this a blocker for you

happy-kitchen-89482 · Answer

The distinction between `python app` and `python binary` and between the `bundle` and `binary` goals was unclear and possibly unnecessary You can now embed arbitrary files directly in the ` pex` file using a `files ` target

happy-kitchen-89482 · Answer

Do you need `python app` and `bundle` Or were you using it because it was idiomatic in v1

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

gt You can now embed arbitrary files directly in the pex file using a files target That would be the main difference If the files are bundled directly in the ` pex` vs kept loose outside of the ` pex`

wooden-thailand-8386 · Answer

I do need `python app` and `bundle` I m putting my code inside the pex file but the ML models are kept loose as Eric mentioned So when I run it I normally use flags to point to those loose folders files

wooden-thailand-8386 · Answer

I tried embedding it inside the ` pex` file but my `entrypoint` for the ` pex` is a ML `cli` tool that can t really find the config files and models if it s inside the ` pex` It tries to find it where you re running it from That s basically the main reason why we choose `pants` The `python app` and `bundle` were super straightforward for our use case

wooden-thailand-8386 · Answer

I guess all I d have to do is change my CI get the binary ` pex` and then all those loose files and put them together instead of that single ` tar gz` for my Dockerfile

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

Got it Yeah I agree we ll want it back The only reason we removed it was that the old mechanism was pretty complex and hard to port from the v1 engine to the v2 engine If we could redo it from the ground up we would do it differently We simply haven t prioritized adding it back yet gt I guess all I d have to do is change my CI get the binary pex and then all those loose files and put them together instead of that single tar gz for my Dockerfile Okay Does this work okay If not we can re prioritize adding back `python app` given the importance of it to your use case

wooden-thailand-8386 · Answer

Well if I can annoy you guys with prioritizing things I d say go for the CA Cert thing not working on v2 lol That one I have no way around it

hundreds-father-404 · Answer

Opened <https github com pantsbuild pants issues 10733> to track this If you have any thoughts on what functionality you d like it d be quite helpful to comment For example did you use any of the `rel mapper` stuff