Hi pants devs. So I see the nuance for why

pex_binaries

don't include

files

targets, but converting all of our uses to be compatible with

resources

is a larger project. I'm playing with

docker_image

targets, but I have found that I can pretty easily get the execution env compatible with what I need by depending on the

files

targets I need from the

docker_image

and then using

COPY . /app

in my

Dockerfile

. If a

docker_image

target depends on

pex_binary

, could it then automatically also depend on

files

targets depended on by

python_library

in that

pex_binary

?