Is it due to some exploratory execution where the ...
# generalc
curved-television-6568
04/29/2022, 7:38 AMIs it due to some exploratory execution where the same rule is executed multiple times to see which one completes first that gives rise to logs like these? 🧵
✅ 2
curved-television-6568
04/29/2022, 7:39 AM Copy code
09:34:58.02 [INFO] Canceled: Running experimental_shell_command pantsbuild:pants-config-files
09:34:59.67 [INFO] Completed: Running experimental_shell_command pantsbuild:pants-config-filesr
refined-addition-53644
04/29/2022, 8:08 AMyeah I have seen them too. Earlier I thought it was just during CI/CD but I have seen them locally too
b
bitter-ability-32190
04/29/2022, 1:02 PMThe pants blog has a post about it (kinda) pants does speculative execution.
bitter-ability-32190
04/29/2022, 1:03 PMbitter-ability-32190
04/29/2022, 1:03 PMThatst guess as to what you're seeing
c
curved-television-6568
04/29/2022, 1:07 PMYeah, was my suspicion too… assume this thread may be for verification and possible future action to help improve this to reduce the level of confusion/surprises.
l
loud-laptop-17949
04/29/2022, 4:43 PMMaybe we should add something to the log line to give more context on what is happening?
b
bitter-ability-32190
04/29/2022, 4:44 PMCC @witty-crayon-22786
w
witty-crayon-22786
04/29/2022, 4:54 PMyea: these are either speculation of the sort in the blog post, or speculation on the remote cache (where we fetch from the cache in parallel with running a process)
agreed that they’re noisy. i’ll file an issue.
✅ 1
👍 1
witty-crayon-22786
05/06/2022, 5:11 PMwitty-crayon-22786
05/06/2022, 5:54 PMthe first item mentioned on there is probably trivial, in case anyone wants to take a stab at it… the second item on the other hand… 🤷