https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Join Slack
Powered by
Are there still limitations with using Python vers...
# general
c
Are there still limitations with using Python versions >3.9 with Pants?
We're on pants 2.13, but are working on upgrading to 2.14.1 if that matters
w
The limitation was on the Pants runner itself, not your production code. Recently, a new Pants distribution model using embedded interpreters has taken over.
Basically, 1 pants executable on your system, and it will read the 
pants.toml
of your current directory (or ask to create one). That way you don't have to provide a Pants-specific interpreter
w
any Pants plugin code will need to be compatible with Python 3.9, but the rest of your code can use whichever interpreter it would like.
p
Unless you have in-repo pants-plugins, and then you’ll still need the pants-compatible interpreter to fmt/lint/test those plugins.
lol. @witty-crayon-22786 you beat me to it.
w
coke 😃
w
Yeah, wait a sec - that's not in the installation doc?
c
Unless you have in-repo pants-plugins, and then you’ll still need the pants-compatible interpreter to fmt/lint/test those plugins.
This is exactly my scenario 😕
further complicated by multiple-resolves because... monorepo
c
Is the new pants binary supposed to work with versions <2.15 too? I tried with 2.14 and it seems ok, but there might be hidden issues
c
what's the version string for 2.15?
h
current is 2.15.0rc2
I am cutting 2.15.0rc3 as we speak
e
The new Pants binary works all the way back to Pants v1.late
3 Views
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by