pantsbuild #pex

[omerta ~]$ pex bpython -c bpython -o bpython
[omerta ~]$ ./bpython
bpython version 0.17.1 on top of Python 2.7.13 /Users/kwilson/Python/CPython-2.7.13/bin/python2.7
>>>

dazzling-florist-39383

06/05/2018, 9:41 PM

@rough-minister-58256 nice, thanks

dazzling-florist-39383

06/05/2018, 9:42 PM

yeah, i ought to have just tested it but i’m multitasking too much these days 🙂

enough-analyst-54434

06/06/2018, 2:02 PM

If you'd like to elide the extension, not rename and are creating the pex via

./pants binary

then I don't think it'd be unreasonable to add an option to the

PythonBinaryCreate

task (https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/blob/a70377c842a6b037635d3fc86b42bdd12a2112b8/src/python/pants/backend/python/tasks/python_binary_create.py#L140) so that the extension default could be switched globally in the repo with a pants.ini setting. I think it would also be reasonable to add a parameter to the

python_binary

target to allow said-same at higher precedence (https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/blob/8efe62815b07953931c315bd8b4cc8ae08e24e14/src/python/pants/backend/python/targets/python_binary.py#L37). This is sufficiently narrow that it might be a perfect avenue to test ease or not of contributing pants fixes, which is likely part of life as a pants user.

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 2:23 PM

I was actually thinking about just that

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 2:23 PM

Just haven’t had the time to dig in yet

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 2:26 PM

thanks for the pointers

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 2:59 PM

Later today I’ll start by trying to write an issue for it

enough-analyst-54434

06/06/2018, 3:17 PM

Excellent, thanks Steve!

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 3:19 PM

anyone know if pants lint respects compatibility=

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 4:02 PM

@enough-analyst-54434 please let me know if I should add anything else here: https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/5919

enough-analyst-54434

06/06/2018, 4:09 PM

LGTM @dazzling-florist-39383

dazzling-florist-39383

06/06/2018, 4:11 PM

thanks

wide-energy-11069

06/07/2018, 4:50 PM

Anyone here used pex for AWS lambda? their deployment req is sort of similar to how pex works

happy-kitchen-89482

06/07/2018, 6:50 PM

@wide-energy-11069 no but that would be awesome

happy-kitchen-89482

06/07/2018, 6:50 PM

They require a .zip file and an entry point from the root

happy-kitchen-89482

06/07/2018, 6:50 PM

so it seems like it could be done

rough-minister-58256

06/07/2018, 6:50 PM

https://github.com/wickman/lambdex

rough-minister-58256

06/07/2018, 6:51 PM

(presumably being used by periscope)

happy-kitchen-89482

06/07/2018, 6:51 PM

god bless wickman

🙏 1

😂 1

wide-energy-11069

06/13/2018, 7:50 PM

tried lambdex, it works

rough-minister-58256

06/13/2018, 7:52 PM

nice

dazzling-florist-39383

06/18/2018, 8:15 PM

So, i’m looking for a proper “deploying applications with pex and docker” link or 3, and Google is failing me. Anyone doing something like that and happy with it? Would love some recipes/reading material

dazzling-florist-39383

06/18/2018, 8:16 PM

minimal image + python + some way to get application config

dazzling-florist-39383

06/18/2018, 8:16 PM

not afraid to RTFM, just don’t want to re-invent the wheel

rough-minister-58256

06/18/2018, 8:21 PM

should hopefully be straightforward enough to not require a guide? create a pex, run the pex like a binary, do that in docker - etc - I think? was there more to it than that in your mind?