#general
- e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:43 PMIt would certainly kick some current customers to the curb - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:43 PMAt any rate pants can be smarter and fail fast for a particular chroot - w
witty-crayon-22786
07/29/2015, 9:43 PMk - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:44 PMSo, tying up loose ends - you seem to have a workaround and I need to fork a bug off your issue to address announcing this sort of issue to the user when its detected - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:44 PMDoes that sound about right? - w
witty-crayon-22786
07/29/2015, 9:46 PMyea, that sounds right. thank you again John. - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:46 PMas an aside - I think this issue is exactly the io.netty/org.jboss.netty issue, with different semantics and mechanisms behind it - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:46 PMBut that issue you can hit in a monorepo, and again pants should ideally detect and fail the build - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:53 PMThis brings to mind pants own horrible transgression. When we switched to pantsbuild since the pants pypi package was taken, I failed to s|src/python/pants|src/python/pantsbuild| ... pretty bad since someone can now pip install pantsbuild.pants and pants and then get crazy failures of either. - a
ancient-stone-50795
07/29/2015, 9:54 PMThat would be a pretty disruptive change, but if you want to do it... - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:55 PMI may float that change during doc fixit week when other activity is lowered - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:55 PMYeah - its weighing our convenience vs the probably rare install of those 2 packages in 1 venv. Its unlikely to occur. - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 9:56 PMBut pants definitely at the least sets a bad example right now / is a bad community member because of this - w
witty-crayon-22786
07/29/2015, 10:01 PMearlier we fix that the better probably - a
ancient-stone-50795
07/29/2015, 10:02 PMIt will break every plugin for one, but I’m sure this is the last time we’ll ever make a change like that simple smile - w
witty-crayon-22786
07/29/2015, 10:07 PM😃 - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 10:08 PMThe real impact should be little worse than a standard deprecation cycle, the only extra damage is branches in-flight - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 10:09 PMI'll post an RB during the doc fixit and folks can speak their mind there - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/29/2015, 10:12 PMhttps://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/1882 if folks have feedback ahead of the fixit - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:56 AMhmm, @enough-analyst-54434 how can I submit a change to the cheeseshop repo?
or does that not work with binaries?../pants/rbt post -o - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/30/2015, 12:57 AMWe only have RB setup up for a few of the repos, you can just pull-request for that one - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:57 AMah perfect - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/30/2015, 12:57 AMThanks again - I'm disproportionately excited about this upgrade - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:57 AMnp! - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:57 AMyeah, we achieved a full inversion of the version - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:58 AM1.1.3 -> 3.1.1 - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/30/2015, 12:58 AMwhich is very cool - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/30/2015, 12:58 AMsorry - no fish trophy though - r
rough-minister-58256
07/30/2015, 12:58 AMalso auspicious - e
enough-analyst-54434
07/30/2015, 12:58 AM...which I'd love to know the full story behind