https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:21 PM
    hear ye, hear ye: will be working on the release today
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:21 PM
    if there are any critical fixes to rush in, let me know.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:25 PM
    @enough-analyst-54434: another potentially interesting engine case.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:26 PM
    we have folks internally who want to have a 
    junit_tests
    target depend on a bundled 
    jvm_app
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:26 PM
    in order to actually fork/invoke the bundle from within the test.
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:26 PM
    Yeah - thats equivalent to the scrooge bootstrap case already in
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:26 PM
    Nothing new interesting unless I'm missing it
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:27 PM
    it might be interesting in this case because the test fails unless the "bundle" goal would run
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:27 PM
    someone needs to request that product
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:28 PM
    Sure - but thats planner detail interesting only
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:28 PM
    IE: They'd add a configuration to a test target and a planner would use that to make a different product request
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:28 PM
    ie: for a bundle
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:28 PM
    mm, oh interesting.
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:29 PM
    I think there are only maybe 3 interesting things left
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    11/06/2015, 7:29 PM
    the rest are just all riffs on existing stuff
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:30 PM
    so yea, that definitely works. to allow 
    junit_tests
    to "understand" a dependency on a bundle you need to add a configuration
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:30 PM
    i think that ties into what i've been thinking about "valid vs invalid configuration" though
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:30 PM
    because if you just add a dep there, and you don't have a planner that understands it, it's ignored.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:31 PM
    so perhaps +1 to "deps only exist on configuration"
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:31 PM
    @enough-analyst-54434: ^
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    11/06/2015, 7:31 PM
    brb
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    11/06/2015, 7:35 PM
    Has anyone run into issues with excessive CRC check failures when upgrading to the 0.0.53 hotfix release?
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    11/06/2015, 7:35 PM
    When hitting the artifact cache
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:49 PM
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:49 PM
    Could we kill it?
  • j

    jolly-chef-92794

    11/06/2015, 7:50 PM
    Not sure, depends on the status of the plugin. @gorgeous-fish-11040 @glamorous-carpenter-79 ?
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:50 PM
    I’m trying to get the plugin working at Foursquare
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:50 PM
    We deregister IvyResolve, so we have no resolve.ivy scope at all
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:51 PM
    (our pom-resolve task provides the products Export needs)
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    11/06/2015, 7:52 PM
    I could add to the hackiness of the hack by allowing this to fail silently
1...680681682...2420Latest