#general
- e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 12:59 AMYes - this is the only place they are tied - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 12:59 AMBut 1 target - 18 products - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 12:59 AMIs the thrust - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMso yes, the Target is independent, but the target.configurations should probably only be valid if there is a particular Planner/verb that understands them - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMYes - which we agreed on - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMYou get basic ensurance of this via pythonpath - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMcool. - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMbut not location apppropriateness - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMi would love to have that - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:00 AMSure - you can always run validation passes - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:01 AMthought for half a second about how the symbol table could enforce use-sites, but didn't have any ideas - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:01 AMmmm, i guess. but the planners all know this already - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:01 AMthey do - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:01 AMBasically you either have offline validate - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:01 AMand all planners check all targets - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMor for the current run - I don;t know - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMits certainly valid that no active planner in a run understands a configuration - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMBut that should be fine - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMWe're compiling jvm stuff and there is javadoc config - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMsok - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:02 AMno one will use it in this round - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMright, no active planner... but at least one registered planner - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMRight - thus offline - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMhm' - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMThe only way to check is globally and offline - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMhm. why globally? - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMThat may be false - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMBut globally on the planner side, ask them all to comment - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/26/2015, 1:03 AMWhich makes little sense in a typical run - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/26/2015, 1:04 AMif you were to create Planners inside build files, then yes... but i can't imagine a reason yet to do that