https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/20/2015, 8:39 PM
    Or maybe a new jvm-compile subsystem. BTW, it would be great to figure out how we are going to expose the subsystems in help.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:39 PM
    right, different one
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:39 PM
    @ancient-stone-50795: they're exposed now
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:40 PM
    ./pants help-advanced
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:40 PM
    ...for a task that requires the subsytem
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/20/2015, 8:40 PM
    looking...
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/20/2015, 8:43 PM
    I still think we can do better. It shouldn’t be so hard to find some of them. ./pants run —help should tell you how to turn on JVM debugging. Its practically the only option our users use with that task
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:48 PM
    Yeah, it's in my mental TODO to deal with subsystem options in help
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:49 PM
    Re the other convo: I'm having a hard time deciphering it. What would the subsystem here be?
  • j

    jolly-chef-92794

    07/20/2015, 8:52 PM
    The need is for a way to access named jvm compilation configurations (source level, target level, args)
  • j

    jolly-chef-92794

    07/20/2015, 8:52 PM
    Can subsystem options be dicts?
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    yes
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    options can be dicts
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    and yes, this sounds like a subsystem
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    we already have a subsystem for ScalaPlatform
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    this sounds roughly in that neighborhood
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:53 PM
    @happy-kitchen-89482: just commented on https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/2500/ ... i think there is an issue with 
    register_jvm_tool
    claiming 
    --options
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:54 PM
    @happy-kitchen-89482: +1 re JvmPlatform
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/20/2015, 8:59 PM
    @benjy: what do you think about tagging a subsystem option as 
    advanced=False
    so that it will always display for tasks that support a subsystem?
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:59 PM
    @witty-crayon-22786: oops, that wasn't supposed to be in that change...
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:59 PM
    fixed before pushing
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 8:59 PM
    good catch
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 8:59 PM
    ah, pheew.
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 9:00 PM
    that was some other thing I was noodling on
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/20/2015, 9:00 PM
    but awesome that you're working on that! thanks
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 9:00 PM
    @ancient-stone-50795: I was just going to show subsytem options the same as all others, but move the per-task subsystem section to be near the relevant task's help
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 9:01 PM
    i.e., if you ./pants help foo.bar it shows the help for foo.bar and for subsys.foo.bar
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 9:01 PM
    and advanced etc. all works the same way
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/20/2015, 9:01 PM
    @happy-kitchen-89482: OK, sounds good to me.
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/20/2015, 9:04 PM
    One question about JvmPlatform though
1...616263...2420Latest