#general
- b
billowy-alarm-80641
10/19/2015, 5:37 PMYeah, that text isn’t linkified properly - r
rough-minister-58256
10/19/2015, 5:38 PMlooks like the markdown or w/e isn’t getting translated - r
rough-minister-58256
10/19/2015, 5:38 PMPasted image at 2015_10_19 10_38 AM.png - b
billowy-alarm-80641
10/19/2015, 5:38 PMRight, I see it now - b
billowy-alarm-80641
10/19/2015, 5:39 PMLooks like it broke with the 0.0.52 release - b
billowy-alarm-80641
10/19/2015, 5:39 PMassuming it’s something on our end (and not an issue w/ pypi) - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 6:36 PM@witty-crayon-22786: I'd like us to rip it out anyway, it's just confusing and complicating in all sorts of ways... - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:04 PM@happy-kitchen-89482: how is it complicating? - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:04 PMa few times i've been close (EDIT: to starting to remove it), and then realized it's essentially a noop - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:05 PMor do you mean removing GroupTask itself? - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:05 PMsorry, i've been talking about `jvm_compile`'s usage of GroupTask - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:08 PMI mean GroupTask itself - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:08 PMit's a perversion of Task - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:08 PMand makes a lot of things weird for, now, no reason - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:11 PMremoving GroupTask itself might be out of scope for me at this juncture, but i'd be happy to switch jvm_compile to a top-level task to unblock that? - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:12 PM@happy-kitchen-89482: my question is: does removing GroupTask now make it easier to port tasks to the new engine? if so, i'm all for it. cc @enough-analyst-54434 - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:12 PMif it doesn't, then focusing on removing blockers for the engine port would be a better use of our time - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/19/2015, 7:13 PMfor example, one thing i've been thinking about is deprecatingTask.workdir - b
bored-art-40741
10/19/2015, 7:13 PMI'm not a fan of fooling with GroupTask or jvm_compile in either direction if we're going to start putting real effort into the new engine - b
bored-art-40741
10/19/2015, 7:13 PMIt seems like a waste of effort to refactor and clean up code that's working well enough now and is going to be completely superseded in the medium term future - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:33 PMI think removing it might make migrating to the new engine somewhat easier? - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:34 PMIt's not urgent though - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 7:34 PMmaybe I'll tackle it later - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/19/2015, 7:34 PM@happy-kitchen-89482: what are you planning to do for the JavaOne presentation? - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 9:52 PM@cuddly-architect-27013: I noticed you had two travis-ci jobs outstanding for your change, so I killed the earlier one - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 9:53 PMEvery time you push to your branch you create a new ci job - c
cuddly-architect-27013
10/19/2015, 9:53 PMhey, thanks benjy…i was actually trying to figure out how to do that…seems to require rights? - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 9:53 PMand our travis resources are scarce - c
cuddly-architect-27013
10/19/2015, 9:53 PMyeah, i just wanted to fix the diff up a bit 😕 - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/19/2015, 9:53 PMHmm, there's an X icon when you click into the job