#general
- w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:05 PMyea, maybe. that's pretty functional for an OO language though 😃 - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:05 PMmecause verbs have their own ideas of equals/hash - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:05 PMvery typeclassy - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:06 PMyea. 1 interface. especially since PayloadFields exist and i want these to be the same thing eventually =x - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:07 PMPSA for travis if folks have not noticed - but last week there have been 1hr+ shards, they say something about travis re-queuing - but it doesn't happen - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:07 PMkill them and restart when you find them - the shards - not the job - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:08 PMI killed 2 just now - 1 on Benjy's address move master build, one on ... another old job - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:08 PMwe were down to 3 instead of 5 shards as a result - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:15 PMIs @bright-dinner-81701 a part-time contributor or full? - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:16 PMpart. on our web-tools team, which as a whole is ~25% on board with monolithic builds from source - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:16 PMsigh - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:16 PMOk - that's what I figured. I wanted to pass the npm exmaples slow buck to him! - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/09/2015, 9:17 PMI'll tackle that this afternoon then - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:17 PMwell, doesn't mean he wouldn't want that to be faster. but it might involve deeper changes than just http://pantsbuild.github.io/dev_tasks.html#enabling-artifact-caching-for-tasks - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:17 PMso... if you wouldn't mind =/ - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:20 PMHmm, I thought I'd killed those. - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:20 PMI killed the entire job. - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:21 PMOh, no wait, I reloaded it and it appeared to have passed. - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:25 PMAnyone using DepLookupError in any internal code? - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:25 PMWe only use it once internally, in simple_code_gen.py - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:25 PMand scrooge gen defines its own error with the same name - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:25 PMAnd no code handles this error - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:26 PMI'd like to get rid of it entirely, unless some shop is using it internally, which I doubt - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:26 PMwe're not - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:26 PMcc @witty-crayon-22786 @ancient-stone-50795 - w
witty-crayon-22786
10/09/2015, 9:26 PM^ - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:26 PMthx - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 9:29 PMhmm, I guess maybe it's marginally useful - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/09/2015, 10:06 PM@happy-kitchen-89482: no, we’re not either. - h
happy-kitchen-89482
10/09/2015, 10:08 PMthx