#general
- b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:45 AMI could also imagine "integration covered" and "unit covered" classes of coverage - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:45 AMOne dimension doesn't entirely describe the state of testing for a project - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:46 AMIt doesn't for sure - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:46 AMbut reporting low is a yay to me on the motivation front - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:46 AMCertainly - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:46 AMWe're not close to this being a meaningful critique: but in the magical 100% coverage world, we don't cover all input states - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:46 AMWe basically account for 1% of global global warming via our 6 unit test shards - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:47 AMs/unit/IT/ - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:47 AMIf only travis would accept our combo dollars + carbon offsets - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:48 AMMaybe if we could just save all of our CI runs until the winter months. - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:48 AMI like it! - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:49 AMExcept that doesn't really work in Atlanta - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:49 AMIt gets cold ish here. Today I have been busy migrating more of our CI builds to pants by the way. I had been cautious before but now teams are signing up and doing it themselves. - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:50 AMNice! - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:50 AM++ - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:50 AMThat's great - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:50 AMMaven’s coffin is 12.5% nailed shut - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:50 AMThe last 40% is free - you're almost there - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:50 AMI’m cheating a bit in that as I’m going through our monorepo I’ve found several projects that can just be deleted. - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:51 AMCheating? That's extra credit - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:51 AMI had a VC with the folks at Stash today regarding whether git is going to continue to scale for us. - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:52 AMI assume you use it svn style - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:52 AMlike eveyone else - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:53 AMIs svn style ~= rebase/fully linearized style? - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:53 AMcentral server - b
bored-art-40741
10/02/2015, 1:53 AMoh - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:53 AMIts a damn shame and the cause of a lot of un-needed scale pressure - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:54 AMI’m not sure what you mean by that. We do use a git mirror. They just renamed ‘stash’ to ‘bitbucket’ I spoke with a dev named Stefan Sassen. He was wondering why we want to do this monorepo thing so I pointed him to Google’s @Scale talk. - e
enough-analyst-54434
10/02/2015, 1:54 AMI mean, no user should ever need to touch origin - push or pull - a
ancient-stone-50795
10/02/2015, 1:54 AM@important-piano-50289 has been advising us to split and use one server just for master and another server for git branches, which is what I think you are getting at.