#general
- b
bored-art-40741
09/22/2015, 7:34 PMHm, how does it get triggered/present itself? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:35 PM@bored-art-40741: reproduction: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sbt-dev/mtRuNEGdsLM/discussion - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:35 PM@bored-art-40741: fix: https://github.com/sbt/sbt/pull/2160 - b
bored-art-40741
09/22/2015, 7:37 PMAnd which version was it fixed upstream at? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:38 PMi think it will be in 0.13.10. not released yet, afaik - b
bored-art-40741
09/22/2015, 7:39 PMAh okay - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:40 PM@bored-art-40741: it's unclear whether the next release we use will come from the new independent incremental-compiler repo - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:43 PMhorrible timing, but i'm seeing the following issue with jmake+global @enough-analyst-54434 : - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:43 PMCopy codenote: Generated resource 'file:/Users/stuhood/src/pants/.pants.d/tmp/tmpBwuZfw/compile/jvm/java/classes/examples.txt' warning: Attempt to create a file for '/Users/stuhood/src/pants/.pants.d/tmp/tmpBwuZfw/compile/jvm/java/classes/examples.txt' multiple times error: Failed to create resource for package: '' with name: 'examples.txt': javax.annotation.processing.FilerException: Attempt to reopen a file for path /Users/stuhood/src/pants/.pants.d/tmp/tmpBwuZfw/compile/jvm/java/classes/examples.txt - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:44 PM...which i think implies the annotation processor running in two chunks? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:44 PMvery tempted to "not fix" that, since it doesn't reproduce with isolated - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:44 PM@bored-art-40741, @happy-kitchen-89482 : how are we feeling? - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/22/2015, 7:44 PMIs this an example I added? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:44 PMready to delete some stuff? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:45 PM@enough-analyst-54434: er, no... just thought you might have some idea of why we haven't hit that before - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/22/2015, 7:45 PMWell global has been changed alot and i=unintentional change may have snuck in - a
ancient-stone-50795
09/22/2015, 7:45 PMFYI, I just updated the Square master branch to pants 0.0.48 and turned zinc back on. - b
bored-art-40741
09/22/2015, 7:45 PMI find it difficult to imagine a path of reverts for us that involve going back to global but still living on upgraded pants - b
bored-art-40741
09/22/2015, 7:46 PMSo I say go for it. But let's hear what @happy-kitchen-89482 thinks - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:46 PM@ancient-stone-50795: great!... and you updated zinc as well, presumably? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:46 PM(or using the "baked in" version) - h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/22/2015, 7:46 PMAgreed - a
ancient-stone-50795
09/22/2015, 7:46 PM@witty-crayon-22786, didn’t have to because now the right version gets baked in! - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:46 PM😃 - h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/22/2015, 7:46 PMThe only way we go back to global is to revert back to 0.0.46 - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/22/2015, 7:46 PMi LIKE THESE ANSWERS🍻 4 - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/22/2015, 7:46 PMburn it - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/22/2015, 7:47 PMon it! - l
limited-country-20626
09/22/2015, 7:55 PMsweet - a
ancient-stone-50795
09/22/2015, 8:42 PMI’m seeing this new warning from CI related to caching:Copy code
(repeated many times)13:25:04 02:02 [cache] WARN] Error while reading from remote artifact cache: 'IsolationCacheHitCallback' object has no attribute 'key_to_target’