#general
- h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/21/2015, 9:29 PMSince we know we don't want the jar and the loose classfiles to both be in the artifact, any reason not to fix that now, even though we can't tie it to this problem? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:30 PMsee above: that only helps with the network portion - h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/21/2015, 9:30 PMPossibly also with unzipping the artifact, no? - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:30 PMno... because if you put only the jar in the artifact, you need to extract it once you get it out - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:31 PMbecause you need both (classfiles and the jar) on disk. - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:31 PMso the total work is the same - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:32 PMOkay finally have a local repro - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:32 PMNetwork is a big part of it - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:32 PMAnd now when unpacking local artifacts I'm mostly CPU bound - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:33 PMMaybe compression options changed? - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:33 PMSeems unlikely - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:39 PM@happy-kitchen-89482: actually, you're right that having only the jar in the tar.gz would help. currently we are double decompressing... we still need to do all the io, but we could be decompressing once to get the jar, and then extracting, which is no compression - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:40 PMif you guys are cpu bound, then that might help a bit. - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:42 PMYup, we seem to be CPU + network bound - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:43 PMok - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:43 PMalright, getting on that one. - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 9:43 PMYeah on a laptop, local only, I'm CPU bound - h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/21/2015, 9:44 PMUnrelated: - h
happy-kitchen-89482
09/21/2015, 9:44 PMI posted this pants-related answer on Quora: http://qr.ae/RoHT3j Feel free to upvote it simple smile - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:54 PMdone. - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:54 PMi wonder how much spam i just implicitly requested - f
fancy-queen-20734
09/21/2015, 9:54 PM - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 9:59 PM@fancy-queen-20734: #shipit - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/21/2015, 10:07 PMIf folks could please hold of on patches into master for 20 or so minutes that would be great - f
fancy-queen-20734
09/21/2015, 10:09 PMI will now. - f
fancy-queen-20734
09/21/2015, 10:09 PMsimple smile - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 10:50 PMhm... what is our answer for updating the default cache key gen version for a task? - b
bored-art-40741
09/21/2015, 10:51 PMLike doing it with higher granularity? - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/21/2015, 10:52 PMOK - release is done, time to slam master with those patches: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pantsbuild.pants/0.0.49 - w
witty-crayon-22786
09/21/2015, 10:53 PM@bored-art-40741: well, in this case, i'm changing what goes in artifacts. but no options have changed, so i'm not going to get the automagic invalidation.