https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 12:56 AM
    It is funny, because debian (ubuntu?) themselves use pex for packaging!
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 1:00 AM
    I would not be surprised if this fellow never walked over to talk to Wickman 😕
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 1:06 AM
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    07/10/2015, 1:12 AM
    haha
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 1:12 AM
    hmmm
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 1:13 AM
    that's...odd
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 1:14 AM
    The oddest thing is that he pitched in and reported issues and fixed issues!
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 2:00 AM
    heh
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 2:01 AM
    @ancient-stone-50795: you wouldn't happen to have a pants-related autovalue example lying around, would you?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 2:01 AM
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 2:01 AM
    sorry for the ping
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 2:01 AM
    You just owe him a Coke
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/10/2015, 2:52 PM
    glad my closed PRs could be of help.
  • a

    ancient-stone-50795

    07/10/2015, 2:53 PM
    It is my week to do the release according to the schedule. I have a busy day and an internal pants release I want to get out, so I plan to work on a release tonight or tomorrow morning.
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    07/10/2015, 4:35 PM
    @ancient-stone-50795 I'm happy to swap my release slot this month and take today's if you want - been meaning to upgrade commons
  • a

    adventurous-twilight-44110

    07/10/2015, 5:11 PM
    I'm starting to work on a task identity fingerprint strategy, @happy-kitchen-89482 do you know how I can get only local task-specific options? specifically the options a task (e.g. Checkstyle) registers in 
    register_options
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:12 PM
    There will be a way to do that soon
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:12 PM
    but note that it's almost never correct to fingerprint all the option values
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:12 PM
    many of those values do not affect the build output
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:12 PM
    typically
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 5:13 PM
    the local options?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    07/10/2015, 5:14 PM
    i'm guessing there are at least a dozen bugs where tasks don't hash their own options
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:15 PM
    yes, the local options
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:15 PM
    we could add an optional registration arg that says "mix me into the fingerprint"
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:15 PM
    y
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:15 PM
    but even that is dodg
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:15 PM
    because the question then is "which fingerprints"?
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:16 PM
    but that at least makes this visible
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:16 PM
    and in most cases there's only one fingerprint that matters
  • h

    happy-kitchen-89482

    07/10/2015, 5:16 PM
    the one the task invalidates on
1...353637...2420Latest