#general
- w
witty-crayon-22786
09/12/2015, 1:06 AMshould be able to benchmark this weekend - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:24 AMawesome - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:31 AMfyi - we’re pivoting slightly on the pantsd execution model. wrote up a short addendum to the design doc at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Igrq0eA43gIs4B2rvdSevrsbbgp-OL1vtUdNGdDuWTk/edit#heading=h.smhe4n85w9vq - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:32 AMlmk if anyone has any thoughts - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:39 AMLGTM! - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:40 AMalthough - where is the thin client in the diagram? - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:40 AMit would not have the build graph - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:41 AMbottom - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:41 AMsorry - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:41 AMgot it - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:41 AMthe lowest box - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:41 AMya - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:42 AMsweet. - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:42 AMthis will be wicked - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:44 AMya, pretty stoked for it - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:44 AMneed to trickle out some more reviews, have been preoccupied this week - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:44 AMIf pants can build its own thin cli that will be pretty neat - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:45 AMya - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:45 AMwe can probably steal nailgun client and use it almost wholesale - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:45 AMhah yup - our thinking exactly - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:46 AMwhich allows us to use the native ng client in any c-based wrapper - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:46 AMpailgun - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:47 AMAt some point - since products must be serializable, we can appease language weenies with writing their tasks in whatever they please if they don;t mind suffering the IO over local sockets for local builds - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:48 AMya totally - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:48 AMin fact, we might have a great answer for exactly that pretty soon - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:48 AMexcept for some hard requirement we'd need on client support - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:48 AMthat could become a nightmare for the average joe to install depending - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:49 AMas long as the answer is not-jvm - e
enough-analyst-54434
09/12/2015, 1:49 AMI'll be happy - r
rough-minister-58256
09/12/2015, 1:53 AMthere’s a new project developing internally that combined with the engine refactor could help solve this problem at a more general/global level..