https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:23 PM
    really
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    we would here i think?
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    The target unlike ~everything else is a hacker hacking
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    you can stabilize post-edit
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    we can mess up now and again
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    i mean, we can
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    and we can also not 😃
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    as long as changed never enables the cache
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:24 PM
    It would be nice to get it rock solid right of course
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:26 PM
    @enough-analyst-54434: is there any other way i can help you this week, or should i look into this instead?
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:26 PM
    No - I'm all good on my node quest, just kill the issues that matter to Twitter
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    08/31/2015, 9:28 PM
    ah, I see exactly what you mean w/ setup() and transitions->new types. thx for clarifying - and fwiw, highly value your thinking/approach on this sort of stuff if for nothing else as an awesome vehicle for self-improvement/learning.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 9:29 PM
    ok, thanks.
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:29 PM
    NP - grains of salt of course - it is in fact over the top for a type not exposed as an api
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:29 PM
    which this is not - its 1 dedicated use
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 9:30 PM
    so all the fancy considerations are considerably holding of less weight
  • r

    rough-minister-58256

    08/31/2015, 9:30 PM
    sure, my initial thinking - but a good exercise course nonetheless
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:43 PM
    Oops, I forgot to tag my change
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:43 PM
    doh
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:44 PM
    Did we land on something official for that yet?
  • b

    billowy-alarm-80641

    08/31/2015, 9:46 PM
    I got a lot of feedback, I'm going to take another pass on my RB now
  • b

    billowy-alarm-80641

    08/31/2015, 9:50 PM
    @bored-art-40741: actually, it doesn't seem like there is consensus
  • b

    billowy-alarm-80641

    08/31/2015, 9:50 PM
    do you think the tag should be in the summary or the description?
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:50 PM
    @witty-crayon-22786 or @fancy-queen-20734: Do you know how transitive exclusions should work with 
    transitive=False
    in 
    ClasspathProducts
    ?
  • f

    fancy-queen-20734

    08/31/2015, 9:51 PM
    hmm
  • f

    fancy-queen-20734

    08/31/2015, 9:51 PM
    I think if it just looks at the excludes as defined on the target in question, that should be sufficient.
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:52 PM
    Yeah, it seems like it should be threaded through in the most obvious way
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 9:52 PM
    Just wanted to double check my thinking there
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 10:00 PM
    @fancy-queen-20734: RB is up: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/2744/
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 10:03 PM
    I'm still not 100% convinced that the intransitive behavior makes much sense, but at the same time asking for 
    transitive=False
    is already an advanced usages
1...256257258...2420Latest