https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:42 PM
    ie a 2nd hard link farm
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:42 PM
    that was provided by a task with no caching
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:42 PM
    the tool could trash the dir
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:42 PM
    and we don't care
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:42 PM
    erm - s/hard link/copy
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:43 PM
    The copies would be incremental on change, so expense limited to change size
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 8:44 PM
    ok. and that would be written to by a changed-loop pants instance.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 8:44 PM
    @enough-analyst-54434: er... would that be the 
    dist
    directory, essentially?
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:44 PM
    no
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:44 PM
    it would be in .pants.d - non-user visible
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    just not cached
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    ok, thats a legitimate bridge … because it doesnt even need to have the pants watch support initially
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    or cared about by pants like most other things there
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    it could be in dist
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    i think people will be fine if they have to manually re-run a command to update the NPM modules they depend on (even internal ones)
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:45 PM
    if their normal JS watch tools work for the sources in the target theyre working on
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:46 PM
    which you could get with a copy of NPM modules, even without pants automatic watch/rebuild on change
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:46 PM
    Well this whole tack would work for the transitive set out of the box
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 8:46 PM
    right.
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:46 PM
    it would re-run resolve for the changed graph - however much or little work that was
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    is “changed-loop” a watch tho?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    yes
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    no
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    heh
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    i thought pants didnt have that
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    probably a loop to start
  • b

    bright-dinner-81701

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    oh
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    we have no fs watcher quite yet
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    its all timing based
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 8:47 PM
    er, i think we do?
1...252253254...2420Latest