https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 12:38 AM
    I also have no proper feedback to give on isolated, so
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:38 AM
    yea... technically supporting isolated for direct dep detection was a new feature in cody's patch
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:39 AM
    i suspect it's not far off... will look into it after this goes green
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 12:39 AM
    Really excited to relegate 
    ivy_jar_products
    to ide-only territory
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:40 AM
    yea, that would be awesome
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 12:40 AM
    That's going to kill the buggiest and most upstream-sensitive part of our custom resolver
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    oh...
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    @bored-art-40741: works with isolated and zinc, but not with isolated and jmake
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    oy.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    almost able to collapse this matrix
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    (jmake has no concept of upstream analysis)
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 12:49 AM
    Not to be cynical, but we're off the jmake...
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:50 AM
    yea... square are the last folks. waiting on a zinc fix that fedor submitted to the sbt guys
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 12:50 AM
    Ah, okay
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 12:50 AM
    may want to backport it
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    08/31/2015, 1:40 AM
    ok, merged. thanks patrick
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 1:49 AM
    Looks great, thanks!
  • b

    bored-art-40741

    08/31/2015, 1:49 AM
    I'll adjust the products change tomorrow
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 2:33 PM
    is there a design document or any canonical mailing list discussion around the node.js/webpack work going on? i'm super curious
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 2:36 PM
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 3:32 PM
    @astonishing-jelly-60479: I'm pretty active on this stuff right now, so speak up if you see missing things for your use case
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 3:48 PM
    thanks, definitely will. i threw one comment on the doc and am trying to gather additional requirements
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 3:51 PM
    question though: how would it look if we wanted to include a built JS target as resources in a python_binary? i.e. webpack-compiled, client-side sources we want to ship with a python webapp
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 3:52 PM
    can a python_binary depend on/include a web_bundle?
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 3:56 PM
    This may work today - but ~by accident. The current engine, in general - is to inflexible to allow this
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 3:56 PM
    hah
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 4:03 PM
    so what's the official/supported route, dealing with the dependency in a system external to pants?
  • a

    astonishing-jelly-60479

    08/31/2015, 4:04 PM
    or, are there plans on the roadmap to address that inflexibility? i don't have enough context on that
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 4:10 PM
    Yeah - there are plans. No-one is finding the time to act on them though!
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/31/2015, 4:11 PM
    The past 2 summits we've had the plan
1...244245246...2420Latest