https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:22 PM
    Copy code
    InvalidSpecPath: Spec has absolute path /examples/src/resources/org/pantsbuild/example/hello; expected a path relative to the build root.
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:23 PM
    on the other hand, I think there are valid reasons to keep 
    //
    , at least @average-vr-56795 would probably advocate for it
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:23 PM
    having two ways to specify the same target i would not be in favor of.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:23 PM
    @wide-energy-11069: iirc, in other systems the leading // is required
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:23 PM
    if it's required, then it doesn't suffer from the "two ways" issue.
  • a

    average-vr-56795

    09/21/2017, 6:24 PM
    In other systems, the leading // is required in BUILD files, and optional on the command line
  • a

    average-vr-56795

    09/21/2017, 6:24 PM
    I am generally a big fan of "one way"
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:25 PM
    cool. that’ll do. thanks!
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:25 PM
    does that mean we can bring back being explicit about target name?
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:25 PM
    @wide-energy-11069: if person is interested in tackling https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/3975 as well, that would be awesome. only downside is that it would need to be a conditional deprecation
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:25 PM
    ?
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:25 PM
    a/b/c:c instead of a/b/c
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:26 PM
  • w

    wide-energy-11069

    09/21/2017, 6:26 PM
    i mean to outlaw a/b/c, but only to keep a/b/c:c
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:26 PM
    yea, definitely not... heh.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:27 PM
    we encourage 111, which would mean that every target was redundant
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:27 PM
  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 6:50 PM
    Any thoughts on what would cause a repeated message
    Copy code
    Waiting on compile(src/scala/project-name:project-name): Queued
    ? The message lasts for hours when running 
    ./pants compile src/scala/project-name -ldebug
    I have a Scala 
    2.12
    project with about 50 files, running pants 
    1.3.0
    .
  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 6:50 PM
    Thought it might be a memory issue, that doesnt seem to be an issue. VisualVm looks like this
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:50 PM
    pants is waiting on the compiler to complete
  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 6:50 PM
    @clever-garden-51617 uploaded a file:

    Screen Shot 2017-09-21 at 1.47.20 PM.png▾

  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 6:51 PM
    should profile it to see what it is doing.
    👍 1
  • h

    high-advantage-47550

    09/21/2017, 7:07 PM
    i’m having the same issue @clever-garden-51617, still investigating
  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 7:11 PM
    Let me know what you find out. Looks like my Zinc is stuck in Runnable status.
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 7:12 PM
    if you have jvisualvm open, it should just involve switching to the 'Sampler' tab, then clicking 'CPU'
  • h

    high-advantage-47550

    09/21/2017, 7:15 PM
    yeah, fwiw @witty-crayon-22786 it’s not that i was stuck for a week, i just haven’t had the time to try to fix yet 🙂
  • w

    witty-crayon-22786

    09/21/2017, 7:15 PM
    😃
  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 7:20 PM
    @clever-garden-51617 uploaded a file:

    Screen Shot 2017-09-21 at 2.17.43 PM▾

  • c

    clever-garden-51617

    09/21/2017, 7:20 PM
    Incremental compiler is stuck...on something.
  • h

    high-advantage-47550

    09/21/2017, 7:22 PM
    similarly:
1...181918201821...2420Latest