#general
- s
straight-waiter-86090
02/17/2017, 9:19 PMok. instructions at the end of this bug cleared it up: https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/4202 - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/17/2017, 10:11 PM👏 benjy nice 🕵️ - p
plain-sundown-25537
02/20/2017, 8:48 PMdoes Pants 1.2.0 support pylint - p
plain-sundown-25537
02/20/2017, 8:48 PM? - w
witty-crayon-22786
02/20/2017, 9:12 PMyes - w
witty-crayon-22786
02/20/2017, 9:13 PM - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:49 PMDoes this seem off/bugworthy to anyone, or am I missing something?Copy code[16:45:57][kyle.derr@A000718s-MBP][~/Repositories/allclearid/odin/mono] $ git log --stat -n1 commit 3f6433e6fe590d906beea4d3dd2b0a445667b401 Author: Kyle Derr <kyle.derr@allclearid.com> Date: Mon Feb 20 16:41:01 2017 -0600 asdf docker/java/Dockerfile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) [16:46:00][kyle.derr@A000718s-MBP][~/Repositories/allclearid/odin/mono] $ ./pants filedeps app/sbex1:app <snip> /Users/kyle.derr/Repositories/allclearid/odin/mono/docker/java/Dockerfile <snip> [16:46:03][kyle.derr@A000718s-MBP][~/Repositories/allclearid/odin/mono] $ ./pants changed --parent=master <empty> - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:52 PMis the Dockerfile part of some target? - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:53 PM(i.e. is it a resources?) - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:53 PMyup. (I think that's what
tells you.)filedepsCopy codejvm_app( name = 'app', binary = ':bin', bundles = [ bundle(rel_path='docker/java', fileset=['Dockerfile', 'bin/']), ], ) - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:53 PMhmmmmm - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:54 PMchanged means (I think) targets changed with file dependencies - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:54 PMI’m not sure why app is being elided from that list - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:55 PMYeah. In this case, one of the files in the bundle has changed but it doesn't think that affects the target. - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:56 PMI swore this worked recently? - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:57 PMI've often been known to pretend like something once worked, though. 🙂 - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:57 PMhah - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:57 PMSuch an optimist. - f
fast-megabyte-33579
02/20/2017, 10:58 PMwe don’t use bundles I’m afraid - r
rough-dog-96241
02/20/2017, 10:58 PMsadpanda - w
witty-crayon-22786
02/20/2017, 11:27 PMyea, that looks like a bug. - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:30 AMIs there a way to bundle together dependencies in a list and then re-use that when assigning to a library? - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:30 AMI wonder if
is doing something similar ..tags - w
witty-crayon-22786
02/21/2017, 12:31 AM@purple-oil-45048 : target aliases - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:31 AM - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:31 AMoh - w
witty-crayon-22786
02/21/2017, 12:31 AMtarget(name='a-bunch-of-deps', dependencies=['one', 'two', ..]) - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:31 AMthey work for dependencies as well? - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:32 AMoh - p
purple-oil-45048
02/21/2017, 12:32 AM✨