https://pantsbuild.org/ logo
Powered by
#general
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:00 AM
    I don't remeber in this case with the -C-Tnowarnregex type args
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:02 AM
    still just "jmake: error interacting with the compiler: jmake: error loading compiler main class com.sun.tools.javac.Main jmake: original exception: jmake: com.twitter.common.tools.Compiler"
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    ... oh wait
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    that's a really old main
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    We lifted out all out java commons deps
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    the tool def is now:
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    jar_library(name = 'java-compiler', jars = [ jar(org = 'org.pantsbuild.tools.compiler', name = 'java-compiler', rev = '0.0.1') ])
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:04 AM
    And the main should be (set in pants itself(:
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    org.pantsbuild.tools.compiler.Compiler
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    I think thats what I have in my BUILD.tools... but obviously its not using it
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    make_lib('org.pantsbuild.tools.compiler', 'java-compiler', '0.0.1')
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    So - odd
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    But the main class name comes from pants
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:05 AM
    So if you're on pants > ... 0.0.34 (guess)
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    yea this is 0.0.39 currently
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    That main should be differnet
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    Yeah - thats way past the flip-over
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    oops sorry, my bad, I had flipped back to 0.0.32 for a minute
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    that must be it
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    You were testing me
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:06 AM
    😛
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:07 AM
    okay, perfect. java problem resolved, now I can send you my thrift problem
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:07 AM
    Oh great - I was afraid of that
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:07 AM
    Need to learn to stall
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:08 AM
    So - the one - pre-emptive - pants "problem"
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:08 AM
    Is that it - meaning apache thrift - will fail if you have thrifts in non-leaf packages
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:08 AM
    And I have a bug to fail fast on this
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:09 AM
    Twitter hit this problem - an always existing problem, but somehow 0.0.39 or 0.0.40 made it manifest
  • e

    enough-analyst-54434

    08/04/2015, 2:09 AM
    .., this is for python ... so if your issue is jvm, excuse my rambling
  • m

    mammoth-autumn-2551

    08/04/2015, 2:09 AM
    yea this is for jvm
1...131132133...2420Latest