#general
- w
witty-crayon-22786
05/05/2016, 12:03 AMand linkerd is super cool too. but yea, spam not cool. - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:03 AMeh? - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:03 AMIt would be awesome to get something similar to https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/3825/ for OSX - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:04 AMI'll file an issue and someone who uses / admins / knows OSX maybe can sink their teeth into buildout for OSX ~images - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:06 AMhmm, not sure short of what can be done directly with homebrew - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:08 AMThe homebrew I can handle (still need OSX on a crap computer at home for TurboTax :/), but as to how to make an image / haven't thought about that - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMBut on principle I'm happy to let someone with motivation try to suss that out - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMSo I think you can run OSX in a VM legally and somewhat easily--if you're running it on OSX - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMYou can - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMAnd macstadium supports this - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMSo our OSX CI can be a VM driver? - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:09 AMIts pricey though since - fwict - you'd need to rent a tube to do it - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:10 AMand the tube rent is up there - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:10 AMCouldn't we just drive headless virtualbox or whatever on our existing CI? - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:10 AMThis is why the pants setup script should force paypal on OSX curls - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:10 AMhah - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:10 AMWe've already acknowledged that our OSX CI is master only and not particularly fast - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:11 AM@enough-analyst-54434: Definitely couldn't be a non-profit with that kind of revenue stream! - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:11 AMI'm sure we could handle it - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:11 AMshell corporations are all the rage - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:12 AM - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:12 AMNice - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:13 AMI think the big followup to having Jenkins stable and scalable will be to solidify our py3 support - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:14 AMand another: https://github.com/boxcutter/osx - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:15 AMI'll add those to the issue - thanks - e
enough-analyst-54434
05/05/2016, 12:15 AMYeah - I got ambitious and added pypy too - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:15 AMyup - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:16 AMpypy CI would be killer - r
rough-minister-58256
05/05/2016, 12:16 AMI think we’d love to run pants w/ pypy internally if deemed reliable - great momentum on pypy as of late and its only getting better - b
bored-art-40741
05/05/2016, 12:16 AMpypy as master only would be quite doable