#general
- e
enough-analyst-54434
04/25/2016, 11:51 PMI'm calling ~7 days of rain in a row a monsoon - b
bored-art-40741
04/26/2016, 12:02 AMThe big open question for me right now is how to get Jenkins to emulate a travis-like "restart this failed shard" ability - b
bored-art-40741
04/26/2016, 12:02 AMI'm going to need to explore a bit in the 2.0 plugin world - b
bored-art-40741
04/26/2016, 12:03 AMThe matrix build plugin always really bugged me; the UI was just not good - b
bored-art-40741
04/26/2016, 12:03 AMBut maybe it's gotten better, or something has superseded it - m
mysterious-action-44812
04/26/2016, 12:26 AM@witty-crayon-22786: @enough-analyst-54434 must've missed it what was the workaround? - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:28 AM@mysterious-action-44812: include
, and each test class will output a timer. see john's example--test-junit-parallel-threads=1 - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:28 AMdoesn't report at the method level, but. - m
mysterious-action-44812
04/26/2016, 12:28 AMAh gotcha k will try that - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:28 AM(...er, include the parallel threads flag as well as the timer flag) - m
mammoth-pharmacist-54215
04/26/2016, 12:30 AManyone else available to give a ship-it on: https://rbcommons.com/s/twitter/r/3757/ - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:32 AMhm - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:32 AMi think that for cherry-picks we should not be squashing like that - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:32 AM@mammoth-pharmacist-54215: ^ - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:34 AMI should have thought of that, +1 - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:36 AMcommented on the review... not sure what signoff should look like in that case, but,. - m
mammoth-pharmacist-54215
04/26/2016, 12:36 AMI can push them up to 1.0.x as separate commits but I would like people to be able to see what is going into the change in the RB - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:37 AM@mammoth-pharmacist-54215: one option would be to just have that be part of the rc process - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:37 AM"this rc contains the following new commits" - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:37 AMThe CHANGELOG edits - exactly - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:38 AMSo, after cherry picking, the release process for a new RC is identical - m
mammoth-pharmacist-54215
04/26/2016, 12:38 AMI think it make sense to not push the cherry-picks to the long lived branch until you get sign off on the RB - m
mammoth-pharmacist-54215
04/26/2016, 12:39 AMso probably the process would include listing the cherry-picks and then pushing the cherry picks to the long lived branch as well as a squash of changelog, etc changes. - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:39 AMI think the gold focus should be tags - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:39 AMThis makes any branch, master or 1.0.x fungible - w
witty-crayon-22786
04/26/2016, 12:40 AM+1 - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:40 AMNothing is real until tagged and released - m
mammoth-pharmacist-54215
04/26/2016, 12:40 AMis there a sane way to get rbt to not include certain commits in the RB other than based on what your upstream branch has? - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:40 AMForget rbt, it's git - e
enough-analyst-54434
04/26/2016, 12:41 AMYou can use --parent