#general
- w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 6:57 PM@wide-energy-11069: hm... the jvm_options case is a bit different i think. that's a valid global option - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 6:58 PM@wide-energy-11069: the second bit of @fancy-queen-20734 's description there is the one that is critical: "It also means that pants will accept and ignore any flag as long as the scope in question is never evaluated. For example:" - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 6:58 PMyeah. @happy-kitchen-89482 pointed that out as ‘stealing' - h
happy-kitchen-89482
03/21/2016, 7:00 PMMaybe we can address stealing by assigning to the explicit cmd-line scope (bundle, in this case) before assigning based on prefixes, instead of after (as today). - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 7:01 PMthat would make it required to place global options first on the cli? fine, but big change - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 7:03 PMso fair to address
first, then separate ‘stealing’ to another issue?bundle --jvm-bundle-archive=zip - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 7:04 PMyea, i think they're probably different levels of importance - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 7:04 PMsounds good - h
happy-kitchen-89482
03/21/2016, 7:14 PMsgtm - c
curved-manchester-66006
03/21/2016, 7:41 PMstuhood: by "not yet" python for
, did you mean to imply there was a ticket or adjacent task?managed_jar_dependencies - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 7:41 PMwe hope to support freezing additional types of resolutions generically. but no, not to the point of tickets. - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 7:42 PMsimilar to buildgen.go - c
curved-manchester-66006
03/21/2016, 7:42 PMThanks, got it. Managed to run into it twice today and keep an eye out - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 9:29 PMcurrently how does pants know
task needs to check fortest
scope options?jvm - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 9:29 PMis it hardcoded somewhere? - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 9:31 PM@wide-energy-11069: it's a subsystem dependency - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 9:31 PMpossibly of a superclass of JUnitRun - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 9:32 PMyea... JUnitRun extends JvmTask, which has a subsystem dependency onpants.backend.jvm.subsystems.jvm.JVM - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 9:32 PM@wide-energy-11069: ^ - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 9:33 PMclass JUnitRun(TestRunnerTaskMixin, JvmToolTaskMixin, JvmTask): - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/21/2016, 9:33 PMand then the options system** looks at the transitive closure of subsystems a task needs - w
wide-energy-11069
03/21/2016, 9:33 PMi see. ty - j
jolly-doctor-21349
03/22/2016, 2:14 PMI'm having issues with resolving python requirements with pants 0.0.70, anyone know what might cause this?Copy codeException message: Could not satisfy all requirements for boto==2.38.0: boto==2.38.0, boto>=2.20.0(from: moto==0.4.10) - j
jolly-chef-92794
03/22/2016, 4:51 PMHey @fancy-queen-20734, I’m getting errors trying to upgrade to latest pants in our internal repo. It looks like
is returning None for some targets, and that’s breaking theIvyFetchResolveResult._jar_dependencies_for_target
infor jar in coordinatesIvyInfo.get_resolved_jars_for_coordinates - j
jolly-chef-92794
03/22/2016, 4:52 PMIs that just a matter of changing:
to:self._frozen_resolutions[conf].target_to_resolved_coordinates.get(target)
Or is there a deeper problem at work here?self._frozen_resolutions[conf].target_to_resolved_coordinates.get(target, []) - w
witty-crayon-22786
03/22/2016, 4:53 PMi believe he is at a conference... - b
bored-art-40741
03/22/2016, 4:55 PM@jolly-doctor-21349: That's sort of a nonsensical error, considering those are overlapping sets - b
bored-art-40741
03/22/2016, 4:55 PMSmells like pex resolution - j
jolly-chef-92794
03/22/2016, 5:09 PMI’ll try changing it then and see if it breaks ci - a
average-yacht-43028
03/22/2016, 5:42 PMi have some 3rd party dependencies which are not in the central maven repository. How do i list those external repositories that need to be downloaded to ivy?